Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) is a popular method for estimating the abundance and density of wildlife populations. A standard SCR model consists of two sub-models: one for the activity centers of individuals and the other for the detections of each individual conditional on its activity center. So far, the detection sub-model of most SCR models is designed for sampling situations where fixed trap arrays are used to detect individuals. Non-invasive genetic sampling (NGS) is widely applied in SCR studies. Using NGS methods, one often searches the study area for potential sources of DNA such as hairs and faeces, and records the locations of these samples. To analyse such data with SCR models, investigators usually impose an artificial detector grid and project detections to the nearest detector. However, there is a trade-off between the computational efficiency (fewer detectors) and the spatial accuracy (more detectors) when using this method. Here, we propose a point process model for the detection process of SCR studies using NGS. The model better reflects the spatially continuous detection process and allows all spatial information in the data to be used without approximation error. As in many SCR models, we also use a point process model for the activity centers of individuals. The resulting hierarchical point process model enables estimation of total population size without imputing unobserved individuals via data augmentation, which can be computationally cumbersome. We write custom distributions for those spatial point processes and fit the SCR model in a Bayesian framework using Markov chain Monte Carlo in the R package nimble. Simulations indicate good performance of the proposed model for parameter estimation. We demonstrate the application of the model in a real-life scenario by fitting it to NGS data of female wolverines ( Gulo gulo ) collected in three counties of Norway during the winter of 2018/19. Our model estimates that the density of female wolverines is 9.53 (95% CI: 8--11) per 10,000km^2 in the study area. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 288 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 124,170
- In ecology: 3,844
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 95,650
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 86,459
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!