Sequence evaluation and comparative analysis of novel assays for intact proviral HIV-1 DNA
Shane D. Falcinelli,
Thiago Y. Oliveira,
Julio C.C. Lorenzi,
Katherine S. James,
JoAnn D. Kuruc,
Nancie M Archin,
Robert F. Siliciano,
David M Margolis,
Michel C. Nussenzweig
Posted 09 Oct 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.07.330787
Posted 09 Oct 2020
The HIV proviral reservoir is the major barrier to cure. The predominantly replication-defective proviral landscape makes the measurement of virus that is likely to cause rebound upon ART-cessation challenging. To address this issue, novel assays to measure intact HIV proviruses have been developed. The Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA) is a high-throughput assay that uses two probes to exclude the majority of defective proviruses and determine the frequency of intact proviruses, albeit without sequence confirmation. Quadruplex PCR with four probes (Q4PCR), is a lower-throughput assay that uses limiting dilution long distance PCR amplification followed by qPCR and near-full length genome sequencing (nFGS) to estimate the frequency of sequence-confirmed intact proviruses and provide insight into their clonal composition. To explore the advantages and limitations of these assays, we compared IPDA and Q4PCR measurements from 39 ART-suppressed people living with HIV. We found that IPDA and Q4PCR measurements correlated with one another but frequencies of intact proviral DNA differed by approximately 19-fold. This difference may be in part due to inefficiencies in long distance PCR amplification of proviruses in Q4PCR, leading to underestimates of intact proviral frequencies. In addition, nFGS analysis within Q4PCR explained that some of this difference is explained by proviruses that are classified as intact by IPDA but carry defects elsewhere in the genome. Taken together, this head-to-head comparison of novel intact proviral DNA assays provides important context for their interpretation in studies to deplete the HIV reservoir and shows that together the assays bracket true reservoir size.
- Downloaded 152 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 135,066
- In microbiology: 10,158
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 114,339
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 80,477
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!