Electroactive microorganisms play a significant role in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). These devices, which are based on a wide microbial diversity, can convert a large array of organic matter components into sustainable and renewable energy. At present, electricity-producing microorganisms are mostly isolated from sewage, anaerobic sediments and soil, however, the sources are very limited. For a more comprehensive understanding of the electron transfer mechanism of the electricity-producing microorganisms and the interaction with the environment, it is necessary to obtain a thorough understanding of their resource distribution and discover potential resources. In this study, plant tissues were selected to isolate endophytic bacteria, and the electrochemical activity potential of those bacteria was evaluated by high-throughput screening with a WO3 nanoprobe. Twenty-six strains of endophytic bacteria were isolated from plant tissues belonging to Angelica and Sweet Potato, of which 17 strains from 6 genera had electrochemical activity, including Bacillus sp., Pleomorphomonas sp., Rahnella sp., Shinella sp., Paenibacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp.. Moreover, the electricity-producing microorganisms in the plant tissue are enriched. Microbial community analysis by high-throughput sequence indicated that Pseudomonas and Clostridioides are the dominant genera of MFC anode inoculated with angelica tissue.Staphylococcus and Lachnoclostridium 5 are the dominant genera in MFC anode inoculated with sweet potato tissue. And the most representative Gram-positive strain Staphylococcus succinus subsp. succinus H6 and plant tissue-inoculated MFC were further analyzed for electrochemical activity. After nearly 1500 h of voltage monitoring and cyclic voltammetry analysis, the results showed that a strain numbered H6 and plant tissue-inoculated MFC had a good electrogenerating activity. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 100 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 126,502
- In microbiology: 9,731
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 54,433
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 30,319
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!