In the last decade Open Science principles, such as Open Access, study preregistration, use of preprints, making available data and code, and open peer review, have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in many different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of some of these Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https://osf.io/renxy/. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Download data

• Downloaded 4,003 times
• Download rankings, all-time:
  • Site-wide: 2,315
  • In scientific communication and education: 28
• Year to date:
  • Site-wide: None
• Since beginning of last month:
  • Site-wide: 1,106

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide