Predicting cellular aging following exposure to adversity: Does accumulation, recency, or developmental timing of exposure matter?
Kathryn A. Davis,
Thomas W Soare,
Andrew J Simpkin,
Andrew D.A.C. Smith,
Erika J Wolf,
Caroline L. Relton,
Erin C. Dunn
Posted 27 Jun 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/355743
Posted 27 Jun 2018
Exposure to adversity has been linked to accelerated biological aging, which in turn has been shown to predict numerous health problems, including neuropsychiatric disease. In recent years, measures of DNA methylation-based epigenetic age, known as epigenetic clocks, have been used to estimate accelerated epigenetic aging. Yet, few studies have been conducted in children. Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (n=973), we explored the prospective association between repeated measures of childhood exposure to seven types of adversity on epigenetic age assessed at age 7 using the Horvath and Hannum epigenetic clocks. With a Least Angle Regression variable selection procedure, we evaluated the effects of the developmental timing, accumulation, and recency of adversity exposure. We found that exposure to sexual or physical abuse, financial stress, or neighborhood disadvantage during sensitive periods in early and middle childhood best explained variability in the deviation of the Hannum epigenetic age from the chronological age. Secondary sex-stratified analyses identified particularly strong sensitive period effects, such that by age 7, girls who were exposed to abuse at age 3.5 were biologically older than their unexposed peers by almost 2 months. These effects were undetected in analyses comparing children exposed versus unexposed to adversity. Our results suggest that exposure to adversity may alter methylation processes in ways that perturb normal cellular aging and that these effects may be heightened during sensitive periods in development. Research is needed to demonstrate the effect of accelerated epigenetic aging on negative health outcomes following childhood adversity exposure.
- Downloaded 384 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 49,090 out of 101,349
- In genetics: 2,760 out of 5,037
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 71,546 out of 101,349
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 75,761 out of 101,349
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!