Rxivist logo

Premise of study: Leaf morphology is dynamic, continuously deforming during leaf expansion and among leaves within a shoot. We measured leaf morphology from over 200 vines over four years, and modeled changes in leaf shape along the shoot to determine if a composite shape of shapes can better capture variation and predict species identity compared to individual leaves. Methods: Using homologous universal landmarks found in grapevine leaves, we modeled various morphological features as a polynomial function of leaf node. The resulting functions are used to reconstruct modeled leaf shapes across shoots, generating composite leaves that comprehensively capture the spectrum of possible leaf morphologies. Results: We found that composite leaves are better predictors of species identity than individual leaves from the same plant. We were able to use composite leaves to predict species identity of previously unassigned vines, which were verified with genotyping. Discussion: Observations of individual leaf shape fail to capture the true diversity between species. Composite leaf shape-an assemblage of modeled leaf snapshots across the shoot-is a better representation of the dynamic and essential shapes of leaves, as well as serving as a better predictor of species identity than individual leaves. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Download data

  • Downloaded 656 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 47,695
    • In plant biology: 1,048
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 70,968
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 59,943

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide