Antibiotic concentrations in the sinonasal secretions and tissue in CRS patients after oral therapy: a randomized trial
Soo Hee Jeong,
Brett Wagner Mackenzie,
Posted 18 Jun 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.17.158535
Posted 18 Jun 2020
Background: Despite the widespread prescription of antibiotics for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), the extent to which drug distribution to the sinonasal mucosa influences their efficacy remains largely undefined. Methods: Thirty subjects undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for bilateral CRS were randomized to one of three groups: 1) doxycycline (100 mg daily for seven days) 2) roxithromycin (300 mg daily for seven days) and 3) control (no antibiotics given). Drug levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in sinonasal secretions, sinonasal tissues and serum at steady state. Nasal endoscopy (Modified Lund-Kennedy) and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) scores were recorded. Results: Antibiotic concentrations in the nasal secretions were significantly lower compared to those in the serum and tissue (mean mucus/serum ratio at steady state = 0.16 and 0.37 for doxycycline and roxithromycin respectively; p<0.01). A short course of antibiotic intake did not correlate with any difference in clinical outcomes except where slightly higher GSRS scores were reported in the roxithromycin group (p=0.04). Conclusions: Although the efficacy of doxycycline and roxithromycin in sinonasal mucus in vivo cannot be predicted solely from reported minimum inhibitory concentrations, given the added complication of bacterial biofilm antimicrobial tolerance, these results suggest that low mucosal penetration of antibiotics may be one of the factors contributing to the limited efficacy of these agents in the treatment of CRS.
- Downloaded 240 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 121,526
- In pharmacology and toxicology: 932
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 72,304
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 44,556
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!