Coronavirus testing indicates transmission risk increases along wildlife supply chains for human consumption in Viet Nam, 2013-2014
Nguyen Quynh Huong,
Nguyen Thi Thanh Nga,
Nguyen Van Long,
Bach Duc Luu,
Nguyen Thanh Phuong,
Le Tin Vinh Quang,
Vo Van Hung,
Nguyen Thi Lan,
Nguyen Thi Hoa,
Phan Quang Minh,
Nguyen Thi Diep,
Van Dang Ky,
Scott I. Roberton,
Hoang Bich Thuy,
Jonna A. K. Mazet,
Christine Kreuder Johnson,
Damien O Joly,
Amanda E Fine,
Sarah H. Olson
Posted 09 Jun 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.05.098590 (published DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237129)
Posted 09 Jun 2020
Outbreaks of emerging coronaviruses in the past two decades and the current pandemic of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that emerged in China highlight the importance of this viral family as a zoonotic public health threat. To gain a better understanding of coronavirus presence and diversity in wildlife at wildlife-human interfaces in three southern provinces in Viet Nam 2013-2014, we used consensus Polymerase Chain Reactions to detect coronavirus sequences. In comparison to previous studies, we observed high proportions of positive samples among field rats (34.0%, 239/702) destined for human consumption and insectivorous bats in guano farms (74.8%, 234/313) adjacent to human dwellings. Most notably among field rats, the odds of coronavirus RNA detection significantly increased along the supply chain from field rats sold by traders (reference group; 20.7% positivity, 39/188) by a factor of 2.2 for field rats sold in large markets (32.0%, 116/363) and 10.0 for field rats sold and served in restaurants (55.6%, 84/151). Coronaviruses were detected in the majority of wildlife farms (60.7%, 17/28) and in the Malayan porcupines (6.0%, 20/331) and bamboo rats (6.3%, 6/96) that are farmed. We identified six known coronaviruses in bats and rodents, clustered in three Coronaviridae genera, including the Alpha- , Beta- , and Gammacoronaviruses . Our analysis also suggested either mixing of animal excreta in the environment or interspecies transmission of coronaviruses, as both bat and avian coronaviruses were detected in rodent feces in the trade. The mixing of multiple coronaviruses, and their apparent amplification along the wildlife supply chain into restaurants, suggests maximal risk for end consumers and likely underpins the mechanisms of zoonotic spillover to people. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 2,486 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 4,410 out of 119,227
- In microbiology: 253 out of 9,418
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 2,093 out of 119,227
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 5,852 out of 119,227
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!