Rxivist logo

The use of negative control outcomes in Mendelian Randomisation to detect potential population stratification or selection bias.

By Eleanor Sanderson, Tom G Richardson, Gibran Hemani, George Davey Smith

Posted 01 Jun 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.01.128264

A key assumption of Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis is that there is no association between the genetic variants used as instruments and the outcome other than through the exposure of interest. Two ways in which this assumption can be violated are through population stratification and selection bias which can introduce confounding of the relationship between the genetic variants and the outcome and so induce an association between them. Negative control outcomes are increasingly used to detect unobserved confounding in observational epidemiological studies. Here we consider the use of negative control outcomes in MR studies. As a negative control outcome in an MR study we propose the use of phenotypes which are determined before the exposure and outcome but which are likely to be subject to the same confounding as the exposure or outcome of interest. We illustrate our method with a two-sample MR analysis of a preselected set of exposures on self-reported tanning ability and hair colour. Our results show that, of the 33 exposures considered, GWAS studies of adiposity and education related traits are likely to be subject to population stratification and/or selection bias that is not controlled for through adjustment and so any MR study including these traits may be subject to bias that cannot be identified through standard pleiotropy robust methods. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Download data

  • Downloaded 467 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 72,793
    • In genetics: 3,128
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 73,368
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 48,228

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide