Lifestyle Risk Score for aggregating multiple lifestyle factors: Handling missingness of individual lifestyle components in meta-analysis of gene-by-lifestyle interactions
Michael R Brown,
L. Adrienne Cupples,
Lisa de las Fuentes,
Diana van Heemst,
Paul S. de Vries,
Ko Willems van Dijk,
Yun Ju Sung,
Alanna C. Morrison,
Posted 28 May 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.26.116723
Posted 28 May 2020
Recent studies consider lifestyle risk score (LRS), an aggregation of multiple lifestyle exposures, in identifying association of gene-lifestyle interaction with disease traits. However, not all cohorts have data on all lifestyle factors, leading to increased heterogeneity in the environmental exposure in collaborative meta-analyses. We compared and evaluated four approaches (Naïve, Safe, Complete and Moderator Approaches) to handle the missingness in LRS-stratified meta-analyses under various scenarios. Compared to "benchmark" results with all lifestyle factors available for all cohorts, the Complete Approach, which included only cohorts with all lifestyle components, was underpowered, and the Naïve Approach, which utilized all available data and ignored the missingness, was slightly liberal. The Safe Approach, which used all data in LRS-exposed group and only included cohorts with all lifestyle factors available in the LRS-unexposed group, and the Moderator Approach, which handled missingness via moderator meta-regression, were both slightly conservative and yielded almost identical p-values. We also evaluated the performance of the Safe Approach under different scenarios. We observed that the larger the proportion of cohorts without missingness included, the more accurate the results compared to "benchmark" results. In conclusion, we generally recommend the Safe Approach to handle heterogeneity in the LRS based genome-wide interaction meta-analyses. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 113 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 128,045
- In genetics: 5,344
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 119,541
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 91,235
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!