Sex and Power: sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications
Robert C. Brooks,
William K Cornwell,
D. S. Falster,
A. M. Senior,
D. A. W. Noble,
Posted 26 May 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.23.106146
Posted 26 May 2020
Biomedical and clinical sciences are experiencing a renewed interest in the fact that males and females differ in many anatomic, physiological, and behavioral traits. Sex differences in trait variability, however, are yet to receive similar recognition. In medical science, mammalian females are assumed to have higher trait variability due to estrus cycles (the "estrus-mediated variability hypothesis"); historically in biomedical research, females have been excluded for this reason. Contrastingly, evolutionary theory and associated data support the "greater male variability hypothesis". Here, we test these competing hypotheses in 218 traits measured in over 27,000 mice, using meta-analysis methods. Neither hypothesis could universally explain patterns in trait variability. Sex-bias in variability was trait-dependent. While greater male variability was found in morphological traits, females were much more variable in immunological traits. We discuss the importance of sex-specific trait variability in relation to their eco-evolutionary ramifications (e.g., sex-dependent responses and adaptations to climate change) and statistical implications (e.g., power analysis considering sex difference in variance). ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 175 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 72,870 out of 88,456
- In evolutionary biology: 4,695 out of 5,417
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 18,514 out of 88,456
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 7,179 out of 88,456
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!