Investigating an in-silico approach for prioritizing antidepressant drug prescription based on drug-induced expression profiles and predicted gene expression
In clinical practice, antidepressant prescription is a trial and error approach, which is time consuming and discomforting for patients. This study investigated an in-silico approach for ranking antidepressants based on their hypothetical likelihood of efficacy. We determined the transcriptomic profile of citalopram remitters by performing a transcriptomic-wide association study on STAR*D data (N =1163). The transcriptional profile of remitters was compared with 21 antidepressant-induced gene expression profiles in five human cell lines available in the connectivity map database. Spearman correlation, Pearson correlation, and the Kolmogorov Smirnov test were used to determine the similarity between antidepressant-induced profiles and remitter profiles, subsequently calculating the average rank of antidepressants across the three methods and a p-value for each rank by using a permutation procedure. The drugs with the top ranks were those having high positive correlation with the expression profiles of remitters and they may have higher chances of efficacy in the tested patients. In MCF7 (breast cancer cell line), escitalopram had the highest average rank, with an average rank higher than expected by chance (p=0.0014). In A375 (human melanoma) and PC3 (prostate cancer) cell lines, escitalopram and citalopram emerged as the second highest ranked antidepressants, respectively (p=0.0310 and 0.0276, respectively). In HA1E (kidney) and HT29 (colon cancer) cell types, citalopram and escitalopram did not fall among top antidepressants. The correlation between citalopram remitters and (es)citalopram-induced expression profiles in three cell lines suggests that our approach may be useful and with future improvements it can be applicable at the individual level to tailor treatment prescription ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 110 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 84,955 out of 92,758
- In bioinformatics: 8,155 out of 8,685
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 41,156 out of 92,758
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 66,082 out of 92,758
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!