Genetic analyses identify widespread sex-differential participation bias
Veera M. Rajagopal,
Pietro Della Briotta Parolo,
Thomas Damm Als,
Matthijs D. Van der Zee,
Felix R. Day,
Ken K. Ong,
Me Research Team,
Eco de Geus,
Peter K Joshi,
David A. Hinds,
Benjamin M Neale,
Raymond K Walters,
Michel G. Nivard,
John R.B. Perry,
Posted 23 Mar 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.22.001453
Posted 23 Mar 2020
Genetic association results are often interpreted with the assumption that study participation does not affect downstream analyses. Understanding the genetic basis of this participation bias is challenging as it requires the genotypes of unseen individuals. However, we demonstrate that it is possible to estimate comparative biases by performing GWAS contrasting one subgroup versus another. For example, we show that sex exhibits autosomal heritability in the presence of sex-differential participation bias. By performing a GWAS of sex in ~3.3 million males and females, we identify over 150 autosomal loci significantly associated with sex and highlight complex traits underpinning differences in study participation between sexes. For example, the body mass index (BMI) increasing allele at the FTO locus was observed at higher frequency in males compared to females (OR 1.02 [1.02-1.03], P=4.4x10-36). Finally, we demonstrate how these biases can potentially lead to incorrect inferences in downstream analyses and propose a conceptual framework for addressing such biases. Our findings highlight a new challenge that genetic studies may face as sample sizes continue to grow.
- Downloaded 3,776 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 4,142
- In genetics: 133
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 45,836
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 35,655
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!