Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 70,182 bioRxiv papers from 306,456 authors.
Computational correction of copy-number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells
Robin M. Meyers,
Jordan G Bryan,
James M. McFarland,
Barbara A. Weir,
Ann E. Sizemore,
Neekesh V. Dharia,
Phillip G Montgomery,
Glenn S. Cowley,
Levi D. Ali,
William F. Harrington,
Derek C. Hawes,
Victor A. Zhivich,
Meghan R. Wyatt,
Jaime J. Chang,
Todd R. Golub,
Jesse S. Boehm,
David E Root,
William C. Hahn,
Posted 10 Jul 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/160861 (published DOI: 10.1038/ng.3984)
Posted 10 Jul 2017
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has revolutionized gene editing both on single genes and in multiplexed loss-of-function screens, enabling precise genome-scale identification of genes essential to proliferation and survival of cancer cells. However, previous studies reported that an anti-proliferative effect of Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage confounds such measurement of genetic dependency, particularly in the setting of copy number gain. We performed genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens on 342 cancer cell lines and found that this effect is common to all lines, leading to false positive results when targeting genes in copy number amplified regions. We developed CERES, a computational method to estimate gene dependency levels from CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens while accounting for the copy-number-specific effect, as well as variable sgRNA activity. We applied CERES to sets of screens performed with different sgRNA libraries and found that it reduces false positive results and provides meaningful estimates of sgRNA activity. As a result, the application of CERES improves confidence in the interpretation of genetic dependency data from CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens of cancer cell lines.
- Downloaded 2,100 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 2,347 out of 70,170
- In genomics: 489 out of 4,696
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 12,184 out of 70,170
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 15,556 out of 70,170
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!