Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 57,789 bioRxiv papers from 265,997 authors.
Across the genome, the effects of different evolutionary processes and historical events can result in different classes of genetic variants (or alleles) characterized by their relative frequency in a given population. As a result, population genetic inference can be strongly affected by biases in laboratory and bioinformatics treatments that affect the site frequency spectrum, or SFS. Yet despite the widespread use of reduced-representation genomic datasets with nonmodel organisms, the potential consequences of these biases for downstream analyses remain poorly examined. Here, we assess the influence of minor allele frequency (MAF) thresholds implemented during variant detection on inference of population structure. We use simulated and empirical datasets to evaluate the effect of MAF thresholds on the ability to discriminate among populations and quantify admixture with both model-based and non-model-based clustering methods. We find model-based inference of population structure is highly sensitive to choice of MAF, and may be confounded by either including singletons or excluding all rare alleles. In contrast, non-model-based clustering is largely robust to MAF choice. Our results suggest that model-based inference of population structure can fail due to either natural demographic processes or assembly artifacts, with broad consequences for phylogeographic and population genetic studies using NGS data. We propose a simple hypothesis to explain this behavior and recommend a set of best practices for researchers seeking to describe population structure using reduced-representation libraries.
- Downloaded 6,154 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 248 out of 57,789
- In genomics: 72 out of 4,057
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 139 out of 57,789
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 282 out of 57,789
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- Top preprints of 2018
- Paper search
- Author leaderboards
- Overall metrics
- The API
- Email newsletter
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!