Amplification-free long read sequencing reveals unforeseen CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity
Marcel den Hoed,
Posted 09 Feb 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.09.940486
Posted 09 Feb 2020
A much-debated concern about CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing is that unspecific guide RNA (gRNA) binding may induce off-target mutations. However, accurate prediction of CRISPR- Cas9 off-target sites and activity is challenging. Here we present SMRT-OTS and Nano-OTS, two amplification-free long-read sequencing protocols for detection of gRNA driven digestion of genomic DNA by Cas9. The methods were assessed using the human cell line HEK293, which was first re-sequenced at 18x coverage using highly accurate (HiFi) SMRT reads to get a detailed view of all on- and off-target binding regions. We then applied SMRT-OTS and Nano-OTS to investigate the specificity of three different gRNAs, resulting in a set of 55 high- confidence gRNA binding sites identified by both methods. Twenty-five (45%) of these sites were not reported by off-target prediction software, either because they contained four or more single nucleotide mismatches or insertion/deletion mismatches, as compared with the human reference. We further discovered that a heterozygous SNP can cause allele-specific gRNA binding. Finally, by performing a de novo genome assembly of the HiFi reads, we were able to re-discover 98.7% of the gRNA binding sites without any prior information about the human reference genome. This suggests that CRISPR-Cas9 off-target sites can be efficiently mapped also in organisms where the genome sequence is unknown. In conclusion, the amplification- free sequencing protocols revealed many gRNA binding sites in vitro that would be difficult to predict based on gRNA sequence alignment to a reference. Nevertheless, it is still unknown whether in vivo off-target editing would occur at these sites.
- Downloaded 1,689 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 7,784 out of 118,977
- In genomics: 919 out of 6,455
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 3,274 out of 118,977
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 9,466 out of 118,977
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!