The challenge of distinguishing cell-cell complexes from singlet cells in non-imaging flow cytometry and single-cell sorting
Julie G Burel,
Cecilia S Lindestam Arlehamn,
Posted 31 Jan 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.30.927137 (published DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24027)
Posted 31 Jan 2020
Our recent work has highlighted that care needs to be taken when interpreting single cell data originating from flow cytometry acquisition or cell sorting: We found that doublets of T cells bound to other immune cells are often present in the live singlet gate of human peripheral blood samples acquired by flow cytometry. This hidden contamination generates atypical gene signatures of mixed cell lineage in what is assumed to be single cells, which can lead to data misinterpretation, such as the description of novel immune cell types. Here, based on the example of T cell-monocyte complexes, we identify experimental and data analysis strategies to help distinguishing between singlets and cell-cell complexes in non-imaging flow cytometry and single-cell sorting. We found robust molecular signatures in both T cell-monocyte and T cell-B cell complexes that can distinguish them from singlets at both protein and mRNA levels. Imaging flow cytometry with appropriate gating strategy (matching the one used in cell sorting) and direct microscopy imaging after cell sorting were the two methods of choice to detect the presence of cell-cell complexes in suspicious dual-expressing cells. We finally applied this knowledge to highlight the likely presence of T cell-B cell complexes in a recently published dataset describing a novel cell population with mixed T cell and B cell lineage properties.
- Downloaded 557 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 58,722
- In immunology: 1,798
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 65,237
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 104,544
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!