A Comparison of fMRI and Behavioral Models for Predicting Inter-Temporal Choices
Felix G. Knorr,
Philipp T. Neukam,
Juliane H. Fröhner,
Michael N. Smolka,
Posted 11 Dec 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/866285 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116634)
Posted 11 Dec 2019
In an inter-temporal choice (IteCh) task, subjects are offered a smaller amount of money immediately or a larger amount at a later time point. Here, we are using trial-by-trial fMRI data from 363 recording sessions and machine learning in an attempt to build a classifier that would ideally outperform established behavioral model given that it has access to brain activity specific to a single trial. Such methods could allow for future investigations of state-like factors that influence IteCh choices. To investigate this, coefficients of a GLM with one regressor per trial were used as features for a support vector machine (SVM) in combination with a searchlight approach for feature selection and cross-validation. We then compare the results to the performance of four different behavioral models. We found that the behavioral models reached mean accuracies of 90% and above, while the fMRI model only reached 54.84% at the best location in the brain with a spatial distribution similar to the well-known value-tracking network. This low, though significant, accuracy is in line with simulations showing that classifying based on signals with realistic correlations with subjective value produces comparable, low accuracies. These results emphasize the limitations of fMRI recordings from single events to predict human choices, especially when compared to conventional behavioral models. Better performance may be obtained with paradigms that allow the construction of miniblocks to improve the available signal-to-noise ratio.
- Downloaded 192 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 117,769
- In neuroscience: 18,024
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 116,535
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 132,384
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!