Rxivist logo

Circumvention of common labeling artifacts using secondary nanobodies

By Shama Sograte-Idrissi, Thomas Schlichthaerle, Carlos J. Duque-Afonso, Mihai Alevra, Sebastian Strauss, Tobias Moser, Ralf Jungmann, Silvio Rizzoli, Felipe Opazo

Posted 25 Oct 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/818351

The most common procedure to reveal the location of specific (sub)cellular elements in biological samples is via immunostaining followed by optical imaging. This is typically performed with target-specific primary antibodies (1.Abs), which are revealed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (2.Abs). However, at high resolution this methodology can induce a series of artifacts due to the large size of antibodies, their bivalency, and their polyclonality. Here we use STED and DNA-PAINT super-resolution microscopy or light sheet microscopy on cleared tissue to show how monovalent secondary reagents based on camelid single-domain antibodies (nanobodies; 2.Nbs) attenuate these artifacts. We demonstrate that monovalent 2.Nbs have four additional advantages: 1) they increase localization accuracy with respect to 2.Abs; 2) they allow direct pre-mixing with 1.Abs before staining, reducing experimental time, and enabling the use of multiple 1.Abs from the same species; 3) they penetrate thick tissues efficiently; and 4) they avoid the artificial clustering seen with 2.Abs both in live and in poorly fixed samples. Altogether, this suggests that 2.Nbs are a valuable alternative to 2.Abs, especially when super-resolution imaging or staining of thick tissue samples are involved.

Download data

  • Downloaded 721 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 20,343 out of 94,912
    • In cell biology: 877 out of 4,894
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 28,676 out of 94,912
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 46,361 out of 94,912

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)