Metabolome-informed microbiome analysis refines metadata classifications and reveals unexpected medication transfer in captive cheetahs
Julia M. Gauglitz,
James T. Morton,
Austin D. Swafford,
Pieter C. Dorrestein
Posted 02 Oct 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/790063 (published DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00635-19)
Posted 02 Oct 2019
Even high-quality collection and reporting of study metadata in microbiome studies can lead to various forms of inadvertently missing or mischaracterized information that can alter the interpretation or outcome of the studies, especially with non-model organisms. Metabolomic profiling of fecal microbiome samples can provide empirical insight into unanticipated confounding factors that are not possible to obtain even from detailed care records. We illustrate this point using data from cheetahs from the San Diego Zoo Safari Park. The metabolomic characterization indicated that one cheetah had to be moved from the non-antibiotic-exposed to the antibiotic-exposed group. The detection of the antibiotic in this second cheetah was likely due to grooming interactions with the cheetah that was administered antibiotics. Similarly, because transit time for stool is variable, early fecal samples within the first few days of antibiotic prescription do not all contain detectable antibiotics. Therefore, the microbiome is not affected by the antibiotics at those time points. These insights significantly altered the way the samples were grouped for analysis (antibiotic vs no antibiotic), and the subsequent understanding of the effect of the antibiotics on the cheetah microbiome. Metabolomics also revealed information about numerous other medications, and provided unexpected dietary insights that in turn improved our understanding of the molecular patterns on the impact on the community microbial structure. These results suggest that untargeted metabolomics data provide empirical evidence to correct records of non-model organisms in captivity, although we also expect these methods will be appropriate for experimental conditions typical in human studies.
- Downloaded 287 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 51,412 out of 83,960
- In systems biology: 1,513 out of 2,222
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 28,854 out of 83,960
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 29,861 out of 83,960
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!