Considering founding and variable genomes is critical in studying polyploid evolution
Posted 16 Aug 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/738229
Posted 16 Aug 2019
A wide range of differences between the subgenomes, termed as subgenome asymmetry or SA, has been reported in various polyploids and different species seem to have different responses to polyploidization. We compared subgenome differences in gene ratio and relative diversity between artificial and natural genotypes of several allopolyploid species. Surprisingly, consistent differences in neither gene ratio nor relative diversity between the subgenomes were detected between these two types of polyploid genotypes although they differ in times exposed to evolutional selection. As expected, the estimated ratio of retained genes between a subgenome and its diploid donor was invariably higher for the artificial allopolyploid genotypes due likely to the presence of variable genome components (VGC). Clearly, the presence of VGC means that exaggerated differences between a donor and a subgenome in a polyploid are inevitable when random genotypes were used to represent species of either a polyploid or its donors. SA was also detected in genotypes before the completion of the polyploidization events as well as in those which were not formed via polyploidization. Considering that significant changes during and following polyploidization have been detected in previous studies, our results suggest that the influence of VGC needs to be considered in evaluating SA and that diploid donors may define changes in polyploid evolution.
- Downloaded 294 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 107,460
- In evolutionary biology: 5,381
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 146,002
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 112,556
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!