Rxivist logo

Sequencing smart: De novo sequencing and assembly approaches for non-model mammals.

By Graham John Etherington, Darren Heavens, David Baker, Ashleigh Lister, Rose McNelly, Gonzalo GarcĂ­a-Accinelli, Bernardo Clavijo, Iain C Macaulay, Wilfried Haerty, Federica Di Palma

Posted 05 Aug 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/723890 (published DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa045)

Background: Whilst much sequencing effort has focused on key mammalian model organisms such as mouse and human, little is known about the correlation between genome sequencing techniques for non-model mammals and genome assembly quality. This is especially relevant to non-model mammals, where the samples to be sequenced are often degraded and low quality. A key aspect when planning a genome project is the choice of sequencing data to generate. This decision is driven by several factors, including the biological questions being asked, the quality of DNA available, and the availability of funds. Cutting-edge sequencing technologies now make it possible to achieve highly contiguous, chromosome-level genome assemblies, but relies on good quality high-molecular-weight DNA. The funds to generate and combining these data are often only available within large consortiums and sequencing initiatives, and are often not affordable for many independent research groups. For many researchers, value-for-money is a key factor when considering the generation of genomic sequencing data. Here we use a range of different genomic technologies generated from a roadkill European Polecat (Mustela putorius) to assess various assembly techniques on this low-quality sample. We evaluated different approaches for de novo assemblies and discuss their value in relation to biological analyses. Results: Generally, assemblies containing more data types achieved better scores in our ranking system. However, when accounting for misassemblies, this was not always the case for Bionano and low-coverage 10x Genomics (for scaffolding only). We also find that the extra cost associated with combining multiple data types is not necessarily associated with better genome assemblies. Conclusions: The high degree of variability between each de novo assembly method (assessed from the seven key metrics) highlights the importance of carefully devising the sequencing strategy to be able to carry out the desired analysis. Adding more data to genome assemblies not always results in better assemblies so it is important to understand the nuances of genomic data integration explained here, in order to obtain cost-effective value-for-money when sequencing genomes.

Download data

  • Downloaded 782 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 37,746
    • In genomics: 3,105
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 99,795
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 127,394

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide