Genomic selection analyses reveal tradeoff between chestnut blight tolerance and genome inheritance from American chestnut (Castanea dentata) in (C. dentata x C. mollissima) x C. dentata backcross populations
American chestnut was once a foundation species of eastern North American forests, but was rendered functionally extinct in the early 20th century by an exotic fungal blight (Cryphonectria parasitica). Over the past 30 years, The American Chestnut Foundation (TACF) has pursued backcross breeding to generate hybrids that combine the timber-type form of American chestnut with the blight tolerance of Chinese chestnut. The backcross strategy has been implemented based on the hypothesis that blight tolerance is conferred by few major effect alleles. We tested this hypothesis by developing genomic prediction models for five presence/absence blight phenotypes of 1,230 BC3F2 selection candidates and average canker severity of their BC3F3 progeny. We also genotyped pure Chinese and American chestnut reference panels to estimate the proportion of BC3F2 genomes inherited from parent species. We found that genomic prediction from a method that assumes an infinitesimal model of inheritance (HBLUP) has a similar predictive ability to a method that tends to perform well for traits controlled by major genes (Bayes C). Furthermore, the proportion of BC3F2 trees' genomes inherited from American chestnut was negatively correlated with the blight tolerance of BC3F2 trees and their progeny. On average, selected BC3F2 trees inherited 83% of their genome from American chestnut and have blight-tolerance that is intermediate between F1 hybrids and American chestnut. Results suggest polygenic rather than major gene inheritance for blight tolerance. The blight-tolerance of restoration populations will be enhanced by advancing additional sources of blight-tolerance through fewer backcross generations and by potentially by breeding with transgenic blight-tolerant trees.
- Downloaded 581 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 52,147
- In genomics: 3,970
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 91,249
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 116,004
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!