Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 57,910 bioRxiv papers from 266,458 authors.
Objective: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterised by two cardinal pathologies, namely the extracellular accumulation amyloid-related aggregates, and the intracellular formation of tau- related neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). While both pathologies disrupt cognitive function, a large body of evidence suggests that tau-pathology has a stronger relationship with the clinical manifestation of the disease compared to amyloid. Given the ordinal nature of histopathological staging systems, however, it is possible that the effect of amyloid pathology has been underestimated in clinicopathological studies. Method: We investigated this possibility using data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database. Bayesian ordinal models were used to directly investigate the relative contribution of Braak NFT, diffuse plaque, and neuritic plaque staging to the severity of antemortem clinical impairment. Results: Data from 144 participants were included in the final analysis. Bayesian ordinal models revealed that Braak NFT stage was the only predictor of global cognitive status, clinical dementia stage, functional abilities, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. When compared directly, Braak NFT stage was a stronger predictor than diffuse or neuritic plaques across these domains. Conclusions: These findings confirm that tau-related pathology is more strongly related to clinical status than amyloid pathology. This suggests that conventional clinical markers of disease progression might be insensitive to amyloid-pathology, and hence might be inappropriate for use as outcome measures in therapeutic trials that directly target amyloid.
- Downloaded 63 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 55,562 out of 57,910
- In neuroscience: 9,771 out of 10,207
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 45,286 out of 57,910
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 33,684 out of 57,910
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- Top preprints of 2018
- Paper search
- Author leaderboards
- Overall metrics
- The API
- Email newsletter
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!