Stratifying major depressive disorder by polygenic risk for schizophrenia in relation to structural brain measures
Mathew A Harris,
Simon R Cox,
Mark J. Adams,
Ian J. Deary,
Stephen M Lawrie,
Andrew M. McIntosh,
Posted 07 Jun 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/663724 (published DOI: 10.1017/S003329171900165X)
Posted 07 Jun 2019
Background: Substantial clinical heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) suggests it may group together individuals with diverse aetiologies. Identifying distinct subtypes should lead to more effective diagnosis and treatment, while providing more useful targets for further research. Genetic and clinical overlap between MDD and schizophrenia (SCZ) suggests an MDD subtype may share underlying mechanisms with SCZ. Methods: The present study investigated whether a neurobiologically distinct subtype of MDD could be identified by SCZ polygenic risk score (PRS). We explored interactive effects between SCZ PRS and MDD case/control status on a range of cortical, subcortical and white matter metrics among 2,370 male and 2,574 female UK Biobank participants. Results: There was a significant SCZ PRS by MDD interaction for rostral anterior cingulate cortex (RACC) thickness (β=.191, q=.043). This was driven by a positive association between SCZ PRS and RACC thickness among MDD cases (β=.098, p=.026), compared to a negative association among controls (β=-.087, p=.002). MDD cases with low SCZ PRS showed thinner RACC, although the opposite difference for high-SCZ-PRS cases was not significant. There were nominal interactions for other brain metrics, but none remained significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Our significant results indicate that MDD case-control differences in RACC thickness vary as a function of SCZ PRS. Although this was not the case for most other brain measures assessed, our specific findings still provide some further evidence that MDD in the presence of high genetic risk for SCZ is subtly neurobiologically distinct from MDD in general.
- Downloaded 181 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 69,133 out of 85,215
- In neuroscience: 12,394 out of 15,166
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 81,691 out of 85,215
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 71,177 out of 85,215
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!