Rxivist logo

Neural trajectories in the supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex exhibit distinct geometries, compatible with different classes of computation

By Abigail A. Russo, Ramin Khajeh, Sean R Bittner, Sean M Perkins, John P Cunningham, Laurence F Abbott, Mark M Churchland

Posted 24 May 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/650002 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.020)

The supplementary motor area (SMA) is believed to contribute to higher-order aspects of motor control. To examine this contribution, we employed a novel cycling task and leveraged an emerging strategy: testing whether population trajectories possess properties necessary for a hypothesized class of computations. We found that, at the single-neuron level, SMA exhibited multiple response features absent in M1. We hypothesized that these diverse features might contribute, at the population level, to avoidance of 'population trajectory divergence' - ensuring that two trajectories never followed the same path before separating. Trajectory divergence was indeed avoided in SMA but not in M1. Network simulations confirmed that low trajectory divergence is necessary when guidance of future action depends upon internally tracking contextual factors. Furthermore, the empirical trajectory geometry - helical in SMA versus elliptical in M1 - was naturally reproduced by networks that did, versus did not, internally track context.

Download data

  • Downloaded 1,438 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 6,716 out of 94,912
    • In neuroscience: 998 out of 16,862
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 7,811 out of 94,912
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 10,214 out of 94,912

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)