Advantages of Multi-shell Diffusion Models for Studies of Brain Development in Youth
Adam R Pines,
Graham L Baum,
Philip A. Cook,
Diego G. Dávila,
Mark A Elliott,
Desmond J. Oathes,
Adon F. G. Rosen,
Russell T. Shinohara,
Danielle S. Bassett,
David R. Roalf,
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Posted 18 Apr 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/611590
Posted 18 Apr 2019
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has advanced our understanding of how brain microstructure evolves during neurodevelopment. Most existing studies of brain development use a simple scalar measure - fractional anisotropy (FA) - to characterize brain tissue microstructure. However, advances in the modeling of diffusion images, such as Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) and Laplacian-regularized Mean Apparent Propagator MRI (MAPL), allow for greater richness in how microstructure is characterized. Nonetheless, the differential utility of these new diffusion models for understanding brain development remains sparsely investigated. Additionally, despite ample evidence that motion artifact is a major confound for studies of brain development, the relative vulnerability of these models to in-scanner motion has not been described. Accordingly, in a sample of 123 youth (ages 12-30) we evaluated FA in comparison to two recently introduced diffusion metrics: intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF) from NODDI and return-to-origin probability (RTOP) from MAPL. Associations with age were evaluated for each of these measures at multiple scales, including mean white matter scalar values, voxelwise analyses, and tractography-based networks. Additionally, we examined the association between in-scanner head motion and each of these measures. Our results reveal that ICVF and RTOP are more associated with development than FA, and are less impacted by motion. Collectively, our findings suggest that multi-shell diffusion models confer notable advantages over FA for studies of the developing brain.
- Downloaded 871 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 11,815 out of 77,974
- In neuroscience: 1,907 out of 13,963
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 5,744 out of 77,974
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 7,360 out of 77,974
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!