Defining tissue- and disease-associated macrophages using a transcriptome-based classification model
Andrew Y.F. Li Yim,
Guillermo R. Griffith,
Wouter J. de Jonge,
Marcel M.A.M. Mannens,
Menno P.J. de Winther
Posted 29 Jan 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/532986 (published DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02887)
Posted 29 Jan 2019
Macrophages are heterogeneous multifunctional leukocytes which are regulated in a tissue- and disease-specific context. Many different studies have been published using in vitro macrophage models to study disease. Here, we aggregated public expression data to define consensus expression profiles for eight commonly-used in vitro macrophage models. Altogether, we observed well-known but also novel markers for different macrophage subtypes. Using these data we subsequently built the classifier macIDR, capable of distinguishing macrophage subsets with high accuracy (>0.95). This classifier was subsequently applied to transcriptional profiles of tissue-isolated and disease-associated macrophages to specifically define macrophage characteristics in vivo. Classification of these in vivo macrophages showed that alveolar macrophages displayed high resemblance to interleukin-10 activated macrophages, whereas macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients displayed a drop in interferon-γ signature. Adipose tissue-derived macrophages were classified as unstimulated macrophages, but resembled LPS-activated macrophages more in diabetic-obese patients. Finally, rheumatoid arthritic synovial macrophages showed characteristics of both interleukin-10 or interferon-γ signatures. Altogether, our results suggest that macIDR is capable of identifying macrophage-specific changes as a result of tissue- and disease-specific stimuli and thereby can be used to better define and model populations of macrophages that contribute to disease.
- Downloaded 841 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 17,333 out of 100,737
- In immunology: 513 out of 3,135
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 22,822 out of 100,737
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 20,984 out of 100,737
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!