Rxivist logo

Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints

By Richard J. Abdill, Ran Blekhman

Posted 13 Jan 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/515643 (published DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45133)

Researchers in the life sciences are posting work to preprint servers at an unprecedented and increasing rate, sharing papers online before (or instead of) publication in peer-reviewed journals. Though the increasing acceptance of preprints is driving policy changes for journals and funders, there is little information about their usage. Here, we collected and analyzed data on all 37,648 preprints uploaded to bioRxiv.org, the largest biology-focused preprint server, in its first five years. We find preprints are being downloaded more than ever before (1.1 million tallied in October 2018 alone) and that the rate of preprints being posted has increased to a recent high of 2,100 per month. We also find that two-thirds of preprints posted before 2017 were later published in peer-reviewed journals, and find a relationship between journal impact factor and preprint downloads. Lastly, we developed Rxivist.org, a web application providing multiple ways of interacting with preprint metadata.

Download data

  • Downloaded 7,837 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 363 out of 90,054
    • In scientific communication and education: 10 out of 612
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 986 out of 90,054
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 3,376 out of 90,054

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)