The recent rise of long read sequencing technologies such as Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore allows to solve assembly problems for larger and more complex genomes than what allowed short reads technologies. However, these long reads are very noisy, reaching an error rate of around 10 to 15% for Pacific Biosciences, and up to 30% for Oxford Nanopore. The error correction problem has been tackled by either self-correcting the long reads, or using complementary short reads in a hybrid approach, but most methods only focus on Pacific Biosciences data, and do not apply to Oxford Nanopore reads. Moreover, even though recent chemistries from Oxford Nanopore promise to lower the error rate below 15%, it is still higher in practice, and correcting such noisy long reads remains an issue. We present HG-CoLoR, a hybrid error correction method that focuses on a seed-and-extend approach based on the alignment of the short reads to the long reads, followed by the traversal of a variable-order de Bruijn graph, built from the short reads. Our experiments show that HG-CoLoR manages to efficiently correct Oxford Nanopore long reads that display an error rate as high as 44%. When compared to other state-of-the-art long read error correction methods able to deal with Oxford Nanopore data, our experiments also show that HG-CoLoR provides the best trade-off between runtime and quality of the results, and is the only method able to efficiently scale to eukaryotic genomes.
- Downloaded 973 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 9,847 out of 77,613
- In bioinformatics: 1,662 out of 7,502
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 56,675 out of 77,613
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 67,752 out of 77,613
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!