Coverage and timeliness of vaccination and the validity of routine estimates: Insights from a Vaccine Registry in Kenya
Ifedayo M O Adetifa,
Laura L. Hammitt,
Thomas N. William,
J. Anthony G. Scott
Posted 02 Oct 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/427773 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.005)
Posted 02 Oct 2018
The benefits of childhood vaccines are critically dependent on vaccination coverage. We used a vaccine registry (as gold standard) in Kenya to quantify errors in routine coverage methods (surveys and administrative reports), to estimate the magnitude of survivor bias, contrast coverage with timeliness and use both measures to estimate population immunity. We found coverage surveys in the 2nd year of life overestimate coverage by 2%. Compared to mean coverage in infants, static coverage at 12 months was exaggerated by 7-8% for third doses of oral polio, pentavalent (Penta3) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, and by 24% for the measles vaccine. Surveys and administrative coverage also underestimated the proportion of the fully immunised child by 10-14%. For BCG, Penta3 and measles, timeliness was 23-44% higher in children born in a health facility but 20-37% lower in those who first attended during vaccine stock outs. Coverage surveys in 12-23 month old children overestimate protection by ignoring timeliness, and survivor and recall biases.
- Downloaded 454 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 73,494
- In epidemiology: 3,241
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 139,420
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 140,746
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!