Rxivist logo

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level

By B. Ian Hutchins, Xin Yuan, James M Anderson, George M Santangelo

Posted 22 Oct 2015
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/029629 (published DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541)

Despite their recognized limitations, bibliometric assessments of scientific productivity have been widely adopted. We describe here an improved method that makes novel use of the co-citation network of each article to field-normalize the number of citations it has received. The resulting Relative Citation Ratio is article-level and field-independent, and provides an alternative to the invalid practice of using Journal Impact Factors to identify influential papers. To illustrate one application of our method, we analyzed 88,835 articles published between 2003 and 2010, and found that the National Institutes of Health awardees who authored those papers occupy relatively stable positions of influence across all disciplines. We demonstrate that the values generated by this method strongly correlate with the opinions of subject matter experts in biomedical research, and suggest that the same approach should be generally applicable to articles published in all areas of science. A beta version of iCite, our web tool for calculating Relative Citation Ratios of articles listed in PubMed, is available at https://icite.od.nih.gov .

Download data

  • Downloaded 9,631 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 265 out of 89,763
    • In scientific communication and education: 7 out of 612
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 16,204 out of 89,763
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 14,743 out of 89,763

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)