Rxivist logo

Random Drift With A Determined Outcome: A Parsimonious Null Model Of Neanderthal Replacement By Modern Humans Via Neutral Species Drift

By Oren Kolodny, Marcus Feldman

Posted 14 Mar 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/116632 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01043-z)

The processes that led to the demise of the Neanderthals and their replacement by modern humans have been the object of heated debate. Most hypotheses fall into one of two categories: one highlights the role of climate change, epidemics, or other environmental pressures in the Neanderthals' demise, and the other attributes it to direct or indirect competition with modern humans, who occupied the same ecological niche. The latter assume that modern humans benefited from some selective advantage over Neanderthals that led to the latter's extinction. We show that a scenario of migration and selectively neutral species drift can explain the Neanderthals' replacement. Our model offers a parsimonious alternative to those that invoke external factors or selective advantage, and represents a null hypothesis in assessing such alternatives. We show that for a wide range of parameters this hypothesis cannot be rejected. Moreover, we suggest that although selection and environmental factors may or may not have played a role in the interspecies dynamics of Neanderthals and modern humans, the eventual outcome, the replacement of the Neanderthals, was determined by the migration dynamics at the end of the middle Paleolithic, namely repeated migration of modern humans from Africa into the Levant and Europe.

Download data

  • Downloaded 641 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 24,949 out of 100,488
    • In evolutionary biology: 1,570 out of 5,999
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 89,527 out of 100,488
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: None out of 100,488

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)


  • 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
  • 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
  • 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
  • 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
  • 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
  • 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
  • 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
  • 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
  • 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!