Creating Standards for Evaluating Tumour Subclonal Reconstruction
Shadrielle Melijah G. Espiritu,
Amit G. Deshwar,
Nathan M Wilson,
Jeff A Wintersinger,
Lydia Y Liu,
Tai-Hsien Ou Yang,
John M Chilton,
Christopher M Lalansingh,
Catalina V Anghel,
DREAM SMC-Het Participants,
Jared T Simpson,
Joshua M. Stuart,
Adam D Ewing,
David C. Wedge,
Quaid D. Morris,
Peter Van Loo,
Paul C Boutros
Posted 28 Apr 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/310425 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0364-z)
Posted 28 Apr 2018
Tumours evolve through time and space. Computational techniques have been developed to infer their evolutionary dynamics from DNA sequencing data. A growing number of studies have used these approaches to link molecular cancer evolution to clinical progression and response to therapy. There has not yet been a systematic evaluation of methods for reconstructing tumour subclonality, in part due to the underlying mathematical and biological complexity and to difficulties in creating gold-standards. To fill this gap, we systematically elucidated the key algorithmic problems in subclonal reconstruction and developed mathematically valid quantitative metrics for evaluating them. We then created approaches to simulate realistic tumour genomes, harbouring all known mutation types and processes both clonally and subclonally. We then simulated 580 tumour genomes for reconstruction, varying tumour read-depth and benchmarking somatic variant detection and subclonal reconstruction strategies. The inference of tumour phylogenies is rapidly becoming standard practice in cancer genome analysis; this study creates a baseline for its evaluation.
- Downloaded 1,902 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 4,553 out of 100,838
- In bioinformatics: 820 out of 9,255
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 21,642 out of 100,838
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 31,739 out of 100,838
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!