Rxivist logo

Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 57,822 bioRxiv papers from 266,142 authors.

A systematic review of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: meta-analysis reveals robust reproducibility

By Tayfun Tumkaya, Stanislav Ott, Adam Claridge-Chang

Posted 13 Jan 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/247650 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.016)

Geneticists use olfactory conditioning in Drosophila to identify learning genes; however, little is known about how these genes are integrated into short-term memory (STM) pathways. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that the STM evidence base is weak. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of the field. Using metrics to quantify variation between discovery articles and follow-up studies, we found that seven genes were both highly replicated, and highly reproducible. However, ~80% of STM genes have never been replicated. While only a few studies investigated interactions, the reviewed genes could account for >1000% memory. This large summed effect size could indicate irreproducibility, many shared pathways, or that current assay protocols lack the specificity needed to identify core plasticity genes. Mechanistic theories of memory will require the convergence of evidence from system, circuit, cellular, molecular, and genetic experiments; systematic data synthesis is an essential tool for integrated neuroscience.

Download data

  • Downloaded 853 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 8,370 out of 57,822
    • In animal behavior and cognition: 95 out of 895
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 16,944 out of 57,822
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 12,022 out of 57,822

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide

Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)