Rxivist logo

Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 57,313 bioRxiv papers from 263,927 authors.

Abundant pollinators are often more generalised than rare pollinators. This could be because abundance drives generalisation: neutral effects suggest that more abundant species will be more generalised simply because they have more chance encounters with potential partners. On the other hand, generalisation could drive abundance, as generalised species could have a competitive advantage over specialists, being able to exploit a wider range of resources and gain a more balanced nutrient intake. Determining the direction of the abundance- generalisation relationship is therefore a chicken-and-egg dilemma. Here we determine the direction of the relationship between abundance and generalisation in hummingbird-plant pollination networks sampled from a variety of locations across the Americas. We find evidence that hummingbirds are generalised because they are abundant, and little evidence that hummingbirds are abundant because they are generalised. Additionally, a null model analysis suggests this pattern is due to neutral processes: most patterns of species-level abundance and generalisation were well explained by a null model that assumed interaction neutrality. These results suggest that neutral processes play a key role in driving broad patterns of generalisation in hummingbird pollinators.

Download data

  • Downloaded 300 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 29,753 out of 57,313
    • In ecology: 977 out of 2,400
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 32,964 out of 57,313
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 45,193 out of 57,313

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide

Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)