Rxivist logo

Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 62,502 bioRxiv papers from 277,505 authors.

Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomisation via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption

By Fernando Pires Hartwig, George Davey Smith, Jack Bowden

Posted 10 Apr 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/126102 (published DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx102)

Background: Mendelian randomisation (MR) is being increasingly used to strengthen causal inference in observational studies. Availability of summary data of genetic associations for a variety of phenotypes from large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) allows straightforward application of MR using summary data methods, typically in a two-sample design. In addition to the conventional inverse variance weighting (IVW) method, recently developed summary data MR methods, such as the MR-Egger and weighted median approaches, allow a relaxation of the instrumental variable assumptions. Methods: Here, a new method - the mode-based estimate (MBE) - is proposed to obtain a single causal effect estimate from multiple genetic instruments. The MBE is consistent when the largest number of similar (identical in infinite samples) individual-instrument causal effect estimates comes from valid instruments, even if the majority of instruments are invalid. We evaluate the performance of the method in simulations designed to mimic the two-sample summary data setting, and demonstrate its use by investigating the causal effect of plasma lipid fractions and urate levels on coronary heart disease risk. Results: The MBE presented less bias and type-I error rates than other methods under the null in many situations. Its power to detect a causal effect was smaller compared to the IVW and weighted median methods, but was larger than that of MR-Egger regression, with sample size requirements typically smaller than those available from GWAS consortia. Conclusions: The MBE relaxes the instrumental variable assumptions, and should be used in combination with other approaches in a sensitivity analysis.

Download data

  • Downloaded 778 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 10,427 out of 62,502
    • In epidemiology: 116 out of 1,556
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 35,269 out of 62,502
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 41,225 out of 62,502

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide

Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)