Insights from an autism imaging biomarker challenge: promises and threats to biomarker discovery
By
Nicolas Traut,
Katja Heuer,
Guillaume Lemaitre,
Anita Beggiato,
David Germanaud,
Monique Elmaleh,
Alban Bethegies,
Laurent Bonasse-Gahot,
Weidong Cai,
Stanislas Chambon,
Freddy Cliquet,
Ayoub Ghriss,
Nicolas Guigui,
Amicie de Pierrefeu,
Meng Wang,
Valentina Zantedeschi,
Alexandre Boucaud,
Joris van den Bossche,
Balazs Kegl,
Richard Delorme,
Thomas Bourgeron,
Roberto Toro,
Gael Varoquaux
Posted 26 Nov 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.24.21266768
MRI has been extensively used to identify anatomical and functional differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Yet, many of these findings have proven difficult to replicate because studies rely on small cohorts and are built on many complex, undisclosed, analytic choices. We conducted an international challenge to predict ASD diagnosis from MRI data, where we provided preprocessed anatomical and functional MRI data from > 2,000 individuals. Evaluation of the predictions was rigorously blinded. 146 challengers submitted prediction algorithms, which were evaluated at the end of the challenge using unseen data and an additional acquisition site. On the best algorithms, we studied the importance of MRI modalities, brain regions, and sample size. We found evidence that MRI could predict ASD diagnosis: the 10 best algorithms reliably predicted diagnosis with AUC~0.80 - far superior to what can be currently obtained using genotyping data in cohorts 20-times larger. We observed that functional MRI was more important for prediction than anatomical MRI, and that increasing sample size steadily increased prediction accuracy, providing an efficient strategy to improve biomarkers. We also observed that despite a strong incentive to generalise to unseen data, model development on a given dataset faces the risk of overfitting: performing well in cross-validation on the data at hand, but not generalising. Finally, we were able to predict ASD diagnosis on an external sample added after the end of the challenge (EU-AIMS), although with a lower prediction accuracy (AUC=0.72). This indicates that despite being based on a large multisite cohort, our challenge still produced biomarkers fragile in the face of dataset shifts.
Download data
- Downloaded 483 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 87,274
- In radiology and imaging: 226
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 14,822
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 7,173
Altmetric data
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
PanLingua
News
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!