A genome-wide association study of mitochondrial DNA copy number in two population-based cohorts
Anna L Guyatt,
Rebecca R. Brennan,
Philip A. I. Guthrie,
Tom R Gaunt,
Heather J. Cordell,
Debbie A Lawlor,
Posted 19 Jul 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/372177 (published DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0190-2)
Posted 19 Jul 2018
Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA CN) exhibits interindividual and intercellular variation, but few genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of directly assayed mtDNA CN exist. We undertook a GWAS of qPCR-assayed mtDNA CN in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), and the UK Blood Service (UKBS) cohort. After validating and harmonising data, 5461 ALSPAC mothers (16-43 years at mtDNA CN assay), and 1338 UKBS females (17-69 years) were included in a meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses restricted to females with white cell-extracted DNA, and adjusted for estimated or assayed cell proportions. Associations were also explored in ALSPAC children, and UKBS males. A neutrophil-associated locus approached genome-wide significance (rs709591 [MED24], β[SE] -0.084 [0.016], p=1.54e-07) in the main meta-analysis of adult females. This association was concordant in magnitude and direction in UKBS males and ALSPAC neonates. SNPs in and around ABHD8 were associated with mtDNA CN in ALSPAC neonates (rs10424198, β[SE] 0.262 [0.034], p=1.40e-14), but not other study groups. In a meta-analysis of unrelated individuals (N=11253), we replicated a published association in TFAM β[SE] 0.046 [0.017], p=0.006), with an effect size much smaller than that observed in the replication analysis of a previous in silico GWAS. In a hypothesis-generating GWAS, we confirm an association between TFAM and mtDNA CN, and present putative loci requiring replication in much larger samples. We discuss the limitations of our work, in terms of measurement error and cellular heterogeneity, and highlight the need for larger studies to better understand nuclear genomic control of mtDNA copy number.
- Downloaded 450 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 58,861
- In genomics: 4,377
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 118,903
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 91,210
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!