Dissecting tumor cell programs through group biology estimation in clinical single-cell transcriptomics
Breanna M. Titchen,
Jett P Crowdis,
Natalie I. Volkes,
David R Liu,
Meng Xiao He,
Eliezer Van Allen
Posted 24 Oct 2021
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.22.465130
Posted 24 Oct 2021
Given the growing number of clinically integrated cancer single-cell transcriptomic studies, robust differential enrichment methods for gene signatures to dissect tumor cellular states for discovery and translation are critical. Current analysis strategies neither adequately represent the hierarchical structure of clinical single-cell transcriptomic datasets nor account for the variability in the number of recovered cells per sample, leading to results potentially confounded by sample-driven biology with high false positives instead of accurately representing true differential enrichment of group-level biology (e.g., treatment responders vs. non-responders). This problem is especially prominent for single-cell analyses of the tumor compartment, because high intra-patient similarity (as opposed to inter-patient similarity) results in stricter hierarchical structured data that confounds enrichment analysis. Furthermore, to identify signatures which are truly representative of the entire group, there is a need to quantify the robustness of otherwise statistically significant signatures to sample exclusion. Here, we present a new nonparametric statistical method, BEANIE, to account for these issues, and demonstrate its utility in two cancer cohorts stratified by clinical groups to reduce biological hypotheses and guide translational investigations. Using BEANIE, we show how the consideration of sample-specific versus group biology greatly decreases the false positive rate and guides identification of robust signatures that can also be corroborated across different cell type compartments.
- Downloaded 381 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 99,922
- In bioinformatics: 8,568
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 8,510
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 17,712
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!