Rxivist logo

Sources of information waste in neuroimaging:mishandling structures, thinking dichotomously, and over-reducing data

By Gang Chen, Paul A. Taylor, Joel Stoddard, Robert W. Cox, Peter A Bandettini, Luiz Pessoa

Posted 10 May 2021
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.09.443246

Neuroimaging relies on separate statistical inferences at tens of thousands of spatial locations. Such massively univariate analysis typically requires an adjustment for multiple testing in an attempt to maintain the family-wise error rate at a nominal level of 5%. First, we examine three sources of substantial information loss that are associated with the common practice under the massively univariate framework: (a) the hierarchical data structures (spatial units and trials) are not well maintained in the modeling process; (b) the adjustment for multiple testing leads to an artificial step of strict thresholding; (c) information is excessively reduced during both modeling and result reporting. These sources of information loss have far-reaching impacts on result interpretability as well as reproducibility in neuroimaging. Second, to improve inference efficiency, predictive accuracy, and generalizability, we propose a Bayesian multilevel modeling framework that closely characterizes the data hierarchies across spatial units and experimental trials. Rather than analyzing the data in a way that first creates multiplicity and then resorts to a post hoc solution to address them, we suggest directly incorporating the cross-space information into one single model under the Bayesian framework (so there is no multiplicity issue). Third, regardless of the modeling framework one adopts, we make four actionable suggestions to alleviate information waste and to improve reproducibility: 1) abandon strict dichotomization, 2) report full results, 3) quantify effects, and 4) model data hierarchies. We provide examples for all of these points using both demo and real studies, including the recent NARPS investigation.

Download data

  • Downloaded 975 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 30,824
    • In neuroscience: 3,904
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 22,782
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 13,729

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide