Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction among Asian Women, Results from Asia Breast Cancer Consortium
Min Ho Park,
Posted 26 Sep 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.23.21263888
Posted 26 Sep 2021
ImportancePolygenic risk scores (PRSs) have shown promises in breast cancer risk prediction; however, limited studies have been conducted among Asian women. ObjectiveTo develop breast cancer risk prediction models for Asian women incorporating PRSs and nongenetic risk factors. DesignPRSs were developed using data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of breast cancer conducted among 123 041 Asian-ancestry women (including 18 650 cases) using three approaches (1) reported PRS for European-ancestry women; (2) breast cancer-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified by fine-mapping of GWAS-identified risk loci; (3) genome-wide risk prediction algorithms. A nongenetic risk score (NgRS) was built including six well-established nongenetic risk factors using data from 1974 Asian women. Integrated risk scores (IRSs) were constructed using PRSs and the NgRS. PRSs were initially validated in an independent dataset including 1426 cases and 1323 controls and further evaluated, along with the NgRS and IRSs, in the second dataset including 368 cases and 736 controls nested withing a prospective cohort study. SettingCase-control and prospective cohort studies. Participants20 444 breast cancer cases and 106 450 controls from the Asia Breast Cancer Consortium. Main Outcomes and MeasuresLogistic regression was used to examine associations of risk scores with breast cancer risk to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsIn the prospective cohort, PRS111, a PRS with 111 SNPs, developed using the fine-mapping approach showed a prediction performance comparable to a genome-wide PRS including over 855,000 SNPs. The OR per standard deviation increase of PRS111 was 1.67 (95% CI=1.46-1.92) with an AUC of 0.639 (95% CI=0.604-0.674). The NgRS had a limited predictive ability (AUC=0.565; 95% CI=0.529-0.601); while IRS111, the combination of PRS111 and NgRS, achieved the highest prediction accuracy (AUC=0.650; 95% CI=0.616-0.685). Compared with the average risk group (40th-60th percentile), women in the top 5% of PRS111 and IRS111 were at a 3.84-folded (95% CI=2.30-6.46) and 4.25-folded (95% CI=2.57-7.11) elevated risk of breast cancer, respectively. Conclusions and RelevancePRSs derived using breast cancer-associated risk SNPs have similar prediction performance in Asian and European descendants. Including nongenetic risk factors in models further improved prediction accuracy. Our findings support the utility of these models in developing personalized screening and prevention strategies. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the performance of breast cancer risk prediction models for Asian women incorporating polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and nongenetic risk factors? FindingsA 111-genetic-variant PRS developed using data of 125 790 Asian women was significantly associated with breast cancer risk in an independent case-control study nested within a prospective cohort, with an odd ratio (OR) per standard deviation increase of 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.46-1.92) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.639 (95% CI=0.604-0.674). The prediction model including this PRS and six nongenetic risk factors improved the AUC to 0.650 (95% CI=0.616-0.685). MeaningOur study provides strong supports for the utility of prediction models in identifying Asian women at high risk of breast cancer.
No download data for this paper yet.
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!