Toward leveraging big data in human functional connectomics: Generalization of brain graphs across scanners, sessions, and paradigms
Sarah C McEwen,
Carrie E. Bearden,
Kristin S. Cadenhead,
Barbara A. Cornblatt,
Doreen M. Olvet,
Daniel H. Mathalon,
Thomas H. McGlashan,
Diana O Perkins,
Larry J Seidman,
Ming T. Tsuang,
Theo G.M. van Erp,
Elaine F. Walker,
Scott W. Woods,
Tyrone D. Cannon
Posted 07 Jul 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/160440
Posted 07 Jul 2017
While graph theoretical modeling has dramatically advanced our understanding of complex brain systems, the feasibility of aggregating brain graphic data in large imaging consortia remains unclear. Here, using a battery of cognitive, emotional and resting fMRI paradigms, we investigated the reproducibility of functional connectomic measures across multiple sites and sessions. Our results revealed overall fair to excellent reliability for a majority of measures during both rest and tasks, in particular for those quantifying connectivity strength, network segregation and network integration. Higher reliabilities were detected for cognitive tasks (vs rest) and for weighted networks (vs binary networks). While network diagnostics for several primary functional systems were consistently reliable independently of paradigm, those for cognitive-emotional systems were reliable predominantly when challenged by task. Different data aggregation approaches yielded significantly different reliability. In addition, we showed that after accounting for observed reliability, satisfactory statistical power can be achieved in the multisite context with a total sample size of approximately 250 when the effect size is at least moderate. Our findings provide direct evidence for the generalizability of brain graphs for both resting and task paradigms in large consortia and encourage the use of multisite, multisession scans to enhance power for human functional connectomic studies.
- Downloaded 535 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 28,658 out of 89,091
- In neuroscience: 4,850 out of 15,842
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 81,502 out of 89,091
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 78,613 out of 89,091
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!