Polygenic Risk Prediction using Gradient Boosted Trees Captures Non-Linear Genetic Effects and Allele Interactions in Complex Phenotypes
Jennifer A Brody,
Paul S. de Vries,
Gina M. Peloso,
Bruce M Psaty,
The NHLBI's Trans-Omics in Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium,
Posted 16 Jul 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.09.21260288
Posted 16 Jul 2021
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are commonly used to quantify the inherited susceptibility for a given trait. However, the standard PRS fail to account for non-linear and interaction effects between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Machine learning algorithms can be used to account for such non-linearities and interactions. We trained and validated polygenic prediction models for five complex phenotypes in a multi-ancestry population: total cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, sleep duration, and height. We used an ensemble method of LASSO for feature selection and gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) for non-linearities and interaction effects. In an independent test set, we found that combining a standard PRS as a feature in the XGBoost model increases the percentage variance explained (PVE) of the prediction model compared to the standard PRS by 25% for sleep duration, 26% for height, 44% for systolic blood pressure, 64% for triglycerides, and 85% for total cholesterol. Machine learning models trained in specific racial/ethnic groups performed similarly in multi-ancestry trained models, despite smaller sample sizes. The predictions of the machine learning models were superior to the standard PRS in each of the racial/ethnic groups in our study. However, among Blacks the PVE was substantially lower than for other groups. For example, the PVE for total cholesterol was 8.1%, 12.9%, and 17.4% for Blacks, Whites, and Hispanics/Latinos, respectively. This work demonstrates an effective method to account for non-linearities and interaction effects in genetics-based prediction models.
- Downloaded 454 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 74,210
- In genetic and genomic medicine: 337
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 14,413
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 6,850
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!