Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank
Shefali S. Verma,
Peter E. Gabriel,
Regeneron Genetics Center,
Katherine L Nathanson,
Danielle L. Mowery,
Marylyn D. Ritchie,
Rachel L. Kember,
Kara N Maxwell
Posted 19 May 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.13.21256833
Posted 19 May 2021
Purpose: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with several cancers, but the predictive ability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from multiple variants is unclear for many cancers, especially among non-European populations. Methods: Genome wide genotype data was available for 20,079 individuals enrolled in an academic biobank. PRS were derived from significant DNA variants for 15 cancers. Logistic regression was used to determine the discriminatory accuracy of each cancer-specific PRS in patients of genetically determined African and European ancestry separately. Results: Among European individuals, four PRS were significantly associated with their respective cancers (breast, colon, melanoma, and prostate), with an OR ranging from 1.25-1.47. Among African individuals, PRS for breast, colon, and prostate were significantly associated with their respective cancers. The discriminatory ability of a model comprised of age, sex, and principal components was 0.617-0.709, and the AUC increased by 1-4% with the addition of the PRS in Europeans. AUC was overall higher in the full model including PRS (AUC 0.742-0.818) in African individuals, but the PRS increased the AUC by less than 1% in the majority of cancers in African individuals. Conclusion: PRS constructed from SNPs moderately increased discriminatory ability for cancer status over age, sex, and nonspecific genetic factors in individuals of European but not African ancestry. Further large-scale studies are needed to identify ancestry-specific genetic factors for cancer risk in non-European populations to incorporate PRS into cancer risk assessment.
- Downloaded 204 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 131,314
- In genetic and genomic medicine: 735
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 42,574
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 64,768
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!