Design and user experience testing of a polygenic score report: a qualitative study of prospective users
Deanna G Brockman,
Jacqueline S. Dron,
Bum Chul Kwon,
Katherine H Huang,
Akl C. Fahed,
Amit V. Khera
Posted 20 Apr 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255397
Posted 20 Apr 2021
Background: Polygenic scores - which quantify inherited risk by integrating information from many common sites of DNA variation - may enable a tailored approach to clinical medicine. However, alongside considerable enthusiasm, we and others have highlighted a lack of systematic approaches for score disclosure. Here, we review the landscape of polygenic score reporting and describe a generalizable approach for development of polygenic score disclosure tools for coronary artery disease. Methods: First, we assembled a working group of clinicians, geneticists, data visualization specialists, and software developers. The group reviewed existing polygenic score reports and then designed a two-page mock polygenic score report for coronary artery disease. We then conducted a qualitative user-experience study with this report and an interview guide focused on comprehension, experience, and attitudes. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed for themes identification. Results: We conducted interviews with ten adult individuals (50% females, 70% without prior genetic testing experience, age range 20 to 70 years) recruited via an online platform. We identified three themes from interviews: (1) visual elements, such as color and simple graphics, enable participants to interpret, relate to, and contextualize their polygenic score, (2) word-based descriptions of risk and polygenic scores presented as percentiles were most often recognized and understood, (3) participants had varying levels of interest in understanding complex genomic information and therefore would benefit from additional resources that can adapt to their individual needs in real time. In response to user feedback, colors used for communicating risk were modified to minimize unintended color associations and odds ratios were removed. Of note, all 10 participants expressed interest in receiving this report based on their personal genomic information. Conclusions: Our findings describe a generalizable approach to develop and test a polygenic score disclosure tool that is desired by the general public. These results are likely to inform ongoing efforts related to polygenic score disclosure within clinical practice.
- Downloaded 627 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 57,396
- In genetic and genomic medicine: 288
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 61,937
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 37,421
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!