Novel insights into joint estimations of demography, mutation rate, and selection using UV sex chromosomes
Sarah B. Carey,
James H. Peniston,
Adam C. Payton,
Jerry W Jenkins,
Stuart F. McDaniel
Posted 31 Mar 2021
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.30.437085
Posted 31 Mar 2021
A central goal in evolutionary genomics is to understand the processes that shape genetic variation in natural populations. In anisogamous species, these processes may generate asymmetries between genes transmitted through sperm or eggs. The unique inheritance of sex chromosomes facilitates studying such asymmetries, but in many systems sex-biased mutation, demography, and selection are confounded with suppressed recombination in only one sex (the W in females, or the Y in males). However, in a UV sex-determination system, both sex chromosomes are sex-specific and experience suppressed recombination. Here we built a spatially-structured simulation to examine the effects of population density and sex-ratio on female and male effective population size in haploids and compare the results to polymorphism data from whole-genome resequencing of the moss Ceratodon purpureus. In the parameter space we simulated, males nearly always had a lower effective population size than females. Using the C. purpureus resequencing data, we found the U and V have lower nucleotide diversity than the autosomal mean, and the V is much lower than the U, however, we found no parameter set in the model that explained both the U/V and U/autosome ratios we observed. We next used standard molecular evolutionary analyses to test for sex-biased mutation and selection. We found that males had a higher mutation rate but that natural selection shapes variation on the UV sex chromosomes. All together the moss system highlights how anisogamy alone can exert a profound influence on genome-wide patterns of molecular evolution.
- Downloaded 148 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 135,261
- In evolutionary biology: 6,653
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 44,865
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: None
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!