Polygenic risk scores lack prognostic value for adults with severe mental illness
Tielman Van Vleck,
Eimear E Kenny,
Benjamin S Glicksberg,
Paul O Reilly,
Eric E. Schadt,
Eric D. Achtyes,
Peter F Buckley,
Dolores P Malaspina,
Steven A McCarroll,
Mark H Rapaport,
Ayman H Fanous,
Michele T Pato,
Genomic Psychiatry Cohort (GPC) Investigators,
Tim B Bigdeli,
Girish N Nadkarni,
Alexander W. Charney
Posted 22 Mar 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.19.21253906
Posted 22 Mar 2021
Schizophrenia (SCZ) is the archetypal severe mental illness and one of the most deeply characterized human genetic traits. Like most common diseases SCZ is highly polygenic, and as such its genetic liability can be summarized at the individual level by a polygenic risk score (PRS). Polygenic risk scores are a cornerstone of the precision medicine vision, as it is widely anticipated they will come to serve as biomarkers of disease and poor outcomes in real-world clinical practice. However, to date, few studies have assessed their actual prognostic value relative to current standards-of-care. SCZ is an ideal test case towards this end because the predictive power of the SCZ PRS exceeds that of most other common diseases. Here, we analyzed clinical and genetic data from two multi-ethnic cohorts totaling 8,541 adults with SCZ and related psychotic disorders, assessing whether the SCZ PRS improves poor outcome prediction relative to clinical features captured in a standard psychiatric interview. For all outcomes investigated, the SCZ PRS did not improve the performance of predictive models, an observation that was generally robust to divergent case definitions and ancestral backgrounds of study participants. These findings demonstrate the limited potential of even the most powerful contemporary polygenic risk scores as a tool for individualized outcome prediction.
- Downloaded 275 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 112,117
- In genetic and genomic medicine: 588
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 28,447
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 38,965
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!