Comparison of clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV2 infection managed in traditional ICU and "Flex" ICU during the surge of the pandemic in the Bronx.
BACKGROUND: As part of the response to increasing critical care capacity during the unprecedented surge of COVID-19 infections, NYC Health + Hospital systems identified and resourced areas in the hospital that could deliver critical care as "Flex" ICUs to complement the traditional ICUs to manage the rapid influx of critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted to the traditional and "Flex" ICUs during the surge of the pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective comparative cohort study of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection on mechanical ventilation admitted to traditional ICU and 'Flex' ICU. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to detect factors associated with death from COVID-19 patients in mechanical ventilation by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Out of the 312 patients on mechanical ventilation, 111(35.6%) were admitted to the traditional ICU, and 201(64.4%) to the 'Flex' ICU. The mortality rate was higher in the 'Flex' ICU compared with the traditional ICU (H.R., 1.37, 95% CI, 1.05-1.81, p<0.05), but the adjusted risk model was not significantly associated with increased mortality (adjusted, H.R., 1.29, 95% CI, 0.97-1.71, p=0.078). CONCLUSION "Flex" ICUs played a crucial role in critically ill patients' management during the pandemic. The mortality risk of patients in the "Flex" ICU was comparable to traditional ICUs in the adjusted analysis. While there is enough evidence for Intensivist managed ICUs to have better outcomes, our study demonstrates the feasibility of non-intensivist leading "Flex" ICUs during a crisis.
- Downloaded 211 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 139,941
- In intensive care and critical care medicine: 334
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 54,949
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 101,605
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!