Long-reads are revolutionizing 20 years of insect genome sequencing
John S. Sproul,
Amanda L. Larracuente,
Steffen U. Pauls,
Joanna L. Kelley,
Paul B. Frandsen
Posted 15 Feb 2021
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.14.431146
Posted 15 Feb 2021
The first insect genome (Drosophila melanogaster) was published two decades ago. Today, nuclear genome assemblies are available for a staggering 601 insect species representing 20 orders. In this study, we analyzed the most-contiguous assembly for each species and provide a "state of the field" perspective, emphasizing taxonomic representation, assembly quality, gene completeness, and sequencing technologies. Relative to species richness, genomic efforts have been biased towards four orders (Diptera, Hymenoptera, Collembola, and Phasmatodea), Coleoptera are underrepresented, and 11 orders still lack a publicly available genome assembly. The average insect genome assembly is 439.2 megabases in length with 87.5% of single-copy benchmarking genes intact. Most notable has been the impact of long-read sequencing; assemblies that incorporate long-reads are ~48x more contiguous than those that do not. We offer four recommendations as we collectively continue building insect genome resources: (1) seek better integration between independent research groups and consortia, (2) balance future sampling between filling taxonomic gaps and generating data for targeted questions, (3) take advantage of long read sequencing technologies, and (4) expand and improve gene annotations.
- Downloaded 1,425 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 13,368
- In genomics: 1,400
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 1,255
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: None
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!